Robots are only
used in place of humans if and only if they do a better job. Why would you put
a robot in a bakery if they make burnt cookies? Now with that said I personally
do not believe having robots in place of certain jobs would really hurt anyone.
I understand the layoffs, and those people who lose their jobs, but that only
happened because they could be replaced by cheaper more efficient machines. I
know this seems harsh but you have to look in the future. The better, and
cheaper the product that is made, the higher the price and amount of people
will go up. Once many robots end up replacing certain human jobs like doctor
and construction worker, the more money the company will make. They do not have
to pay robots they just have to repair them, like a baker would in a bakery,
but at least they have no salary or hourly wage. When the business is able to
get more money they expand creating more jobs in human only positions. You can’t
have a robot leading a company. Lastly, I would like to include an example from
a famous movie reboot, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Charlie’s father
ended up getting replaced by a robot, which was the cause of his layoff. However,
later in the movie you see he than found another job repairing the robot that
replaced him. I do not believe robots would cause a major problem in the long
run.
No comments:
Post a Comment